Viverrids: Civets Great and Small

Small Indian civet

Most species of true civet weigh somewhere between 7 and 9 kg (16 to 20 lbs), somewhat larger than a domestic cat, and similar to a King Charles spaniel or a Highland terrier - albeit of a more slender shape. The large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha) is at the upper end of this range, the second-largest species of true civet. The name of the large Indian civet, however, tends to imply that there must also be a smaller version in the same general area, and so there is.

The small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) is the smallest of the true civets, between 48 and 68 cm (19 to 27 inches) long, not including the tail, and weighing just 2 to 4 kg (4½ to 9 lbs) - more of a toy poodle or a Pomeranian in terms of dog weight. Otherwise, it looks much like its larger cousin, although it has block spots like a Malay civet, rather than the fainter blotches of its larger namesake, and does not have the crest of erectile hair running down its back. The smaller size caused it to be placed in a separate genus from the other civets as early as 1838, and modern genetic analysis has shown that this is fair; the two parted company about 12 million years ago, while the other Asian civets are much more recent than that.

Climate, Cloud Forests, and Cotton Rats

The Cricetidae is the single largest family of mammals in terms of the number of species, at least according to the current count from the American Society of Mammalogists. While the name translates as "hamster family", the great majority of species are not themselves hamsters. In fact, there are five subfamilies of cricetid: the hamsters, the voles, and no fewer than three with members that basically look like mice or rats... even though the true mice and rats belong to the second-largest family, the Muridae.

The largest of these subfamilies is the Sigmodontinae, consisting of mouse and rat-like animals primarily native to South America, although one species lives as far north as Virginia, and several others reach Arizona and New Mexico. The group is named for the S-shaped pattern on the molar teeth and was originally coined as the genus name for the cotton rats in 1825.

Splitting the Troop

Primates are, for the most part, social, group-living animals. This underlies many aspects of human behaviour and likely played a role in our development of intelligence. Often, these groups have a fission-fusion structure, where new members come and go, but, in other species, they can be long-lasting and stable. Either way, just as with nation-states or tribal societies among humans, nothing lasts forever. Groups die and new groups form.

This can be due to disaster or misfortune, but it can equally well be due to success. If a group becomes too large, there may no longer be enough food in the local area to keep it healthy, or parasites or disease may spread too rapidly within it. Or it may simply become too large for dominant individuals to control. In fission-fusion societies, this may lead to a temporary break-up into local subgroups that otherwise remain in contact. Sometimes, however, the pressure is too great and the only solution is for a new group to form.

Viverrids: Civets of Southeast Asia

Large Indian civet

Our definition of the Viverridae family has, as I noted previously, undergone some ups and downs over the centuries. It was first named, in 1821, for the genus Viverra, which, when it was first described, had contained five species. Even by 1821, four of those had been moved elsewhere - and three are no longer even in the family. But, by the rules of scientific naming, unless we scrap the family entirely, Viverra must remain within it. Which leaves one species that, in a sense, defines the family, and against which everything else in it is compared.

That species is the large Indian civet (Viverra zibetha). Thus, even though "viverra" literally means "ferret" in Latin, this means that we can reasonably call the Viverridae "the civet family", as I will be doing from here on in.

The Air Conditioning in Your Nose

The nasal cavities are not mere holes running through the head. Anatomically, at least, that's broadly true at either end - in the vestibule immediately behind the nostrils, and in the nasopharynx above the throat. But in between, in the area above the mouth and separated from it by the palate, the air instead must pass through defined channels. 

These channels are formed by the "conchae", projections from the outer side of each nasal cavity stretching almost to the inner surface, so that most of the air is forced through the narrow slots between them. These conchae are, in turn, formed by the turbinate bones, delicate, paper-thin, sheet-like structures rolled up like a scroll, and covered in the same sort of fleshy lining that we find in, say, the trachea (windpipe). 

Oligocene (Pt 18): Sawfish-Dolphins and Baleen Whales with Teeth

Olympicetus, a simocetid whale

Although the oldest fossils of seal-like animals may date back to the end of the Oligocene, there are very few of these, and the dating may not be wholly reliable. Whales, however, are a different matter and were already well established even at the beginning of the epoch, 33 million years ago. In fact, the Oligocene marks an important phase in their evolution, since it was at this time that the oldest living groups first appeared and that, potentially, the last common ancestor of all living whales roamed the seas.

Even so, especially towards the end of the epoch, it is possible to place some Oligocene cetaceans into groups we are familiar with today. For example, there was Kentriodon, which is better known from the Miocene, but first appeared in the southern oceans at the tail end of the Oligocene. Although it is not placed in any living family, it is the oldest member of a branch that diverged from the common ancestor of dolphins and porpoises around this time. It likely looked rather similar and had a similar fish-and-squid-based diet.

Viverrids: Rise and Fall of a Wastebasket

The carnivorous mammals have been recognised as a taxonomic order since the official dawn of biological classification in 1758. In that first publication, Systema Naturae, Carl Linnaeus listed 36 species. The concept of "families" was a later innovation, but Linnaeus used the rank of "genus" much as we would use families today, and, in the case of what we now call the carnivorans, there were six.

These were the cats, dogs, bears, weasels, seals, and a sixth group that he called (in Latin) "ferrets".