All the World's Antelopes: Sables and Other Horse-Antelopes

Sable antelope (male)

The hippotragines are one of several small subfamilies of antelope. Small that is, in terms of number of species, because physically they are quite large. The name literally translates as "horse-goat", but that second part is often used taxonomically as a term for antelopes, so "horse-antelope" might be closer to the intent. It was coined in 1845, partly on account of the physical build of the animals, with their long legs and muscular, horse-like necks.

The subfamily includes the oryxes and gemsbok, but arguably the most horse-like members of the group are the sable antelope (Hippotragus niger) and its closest relatives. Sable antelopes stand around 140 cm (4'7") at the withers, which is almost exactly the official height that separates full-size horses from ponies. They weigh between 160 kg and 230 kg (350 and 510 lbs), which is well within the range for domesticated ponies, indicating a slighter build than animals bred, in part, to bear the weight of humans. Their shape, however, is quite horse-like, an effect accentuated by the presence of a clear mane down the back of the neck.

Otter Whiskers

Four years ago, I posted about whiskers, a feature common to the majority of mammal species, from horses to mice. They are so widespread that they must have evolved very early on, probably well before marsupials diverged from the placental mammals, back in the time of the non-avian dinosaurs. Even so, as humans, we are probably most familiar with them from domesticated animals, especially the carnivorous ones that so often share our homes.

The carnivorans form a natural evolutionary group within the placental mammals, arbitrarily (if conveniently) ranked as an "order". The various living families within this order can in turn be classified as either "feliform" or "caniform", depending on whether they are more closely related to cats or dogs. The dog-like group contains a great many species, which might be more varied than we would think at first glance.

Eocene (Pt 5): Cerberus and the Pangolins

Eurotamandua

Today, when we think of large carnivorous land mammals, we think of such things as dogs, cats, and bears, but, while some of these families do date back to the Eocene, they were not found in Europe at the time. Instead, the dominant group of carnivorous mammals were the hyaenodonts.

While the name translates as "hyena-tooth" due to the description of the first fossils to be found, hyaenodonts were not hyenas, or even closely related to them. They belonged to a group entirely separate from the living carnivorans, and that survived alongside them until as recently as 10 million years ago, near the end of the Miocene. For most of that time, they could be regarded as primitive holdovers, vestiges of their past glory, but in the Eocene they were still at the height of their power.

Having said this, the first hynaenodonts to enter Europe were physically unimpressive, succeeding largely due to the fact that there wasn't much else to compete with. These are traditionally grouped into a subfamily called the "proviverrines", although the details are debated. For one thing, it's not at all clear which family (if any) they are a subfamily of. This is largely due to the higher-level classification having shifted since they were first named, but the membership of the group is also in doubt, since it's not at all clear that all of the traditionally defined species share a unique common ancestor with one another.

All the World's Antelopes: Gemsbok and Oryx

Gemsbok

As I have discussed previously, there is no such thing as an antelope, in the strict scientific sense. That is to say, they do not form a natural group of organisms, being defined only as those members of the cattle family that aren't sheep, goats, or obviously cow-like. This covers a wide range of animals, some closely related, but others much less so.

I've previously looked at the various species of gazelle, and at the spiral-horned antelopes (which are actually "bovines"). Now it's time to look at the others.

Linnaeus' original catalogue of scientific names, published in 1758, included five species that we would now call antelopes. In that catalogue, they are listed as goats, based primarily on the shape of their horns, and therefore sit alongside the chamois and ibex. Two of these, the dorcas gazelle and the blackbuck, are now placed within the gazelle subfamily, while two others are relatively small "dwarf antelopes", which I will cover later.

Goo Goo G'joob

"Pinnipeds" is the technical term for flipper-footed aquatic mammals that are able (although often with difficulty) to move about on land. Although there had previously been some speculation on the point, we now know that they are a natural group of animals, all descending from a single distant ancestor. They are carnivorans, more closely related to dogs than to cats and probably represent the third major branching within the living dog-like carnivores, after the dogs and bears, but before (for example) the raccoons, skunks, and weasels.

The living species of pinniped are placed within three families, although one or two extinct ones are also recognised. Most pinnipeds belong to the Phocidae, or "seal family". While the term "seal" is often used in modern English to refer to pinnipeds in general, the seal family proper consists of animals especially well-adapted to living in the water. They lack visible ears, and their hind limbs are arranged so to be efficient for propulsion underwater, but almost useless on land, forcing them to haul themselves about using their front flippers only.

Euplerids: Madagascar's Top Mammalian Carnivore

The native mammalian carnivores of Madagascar are mostly obscure to those of us in the West. The one possible exception, thanks to the Madagascar animated film franchise, is the fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). Often spelt with a single 's', especially in more modern sources, and typically pronounced "foosa", this is the largest and most potentially dangerous of all the island's native mammalian predators.

Having said which, it's not especially big compared with predators elsewhere. There is little need to be a large carnivore when the island does not have, for example, any native antelopes. On average, they are about 75 cm (30 inches) in body length, not counting a cat-like tail that adds about the same length again. Adult females weigh around 6 kg (13 lbs), while the largest males can reach 8.5 kg (19 lbs), about the same as a West Highland terrier. 

Exactly where they fit within the mammalian family tree was long a source of confusion, given a mix of features resembling a range of other animals. When English zoologist Edward Turner Bennett first described the animal in 1833, he considered it to be a type of unusually large civet. So it remained for a hundred until it was moved to the cats in the 1930s, back to the civets in the 1940s, and then to the mongooses in the 1990s. Over the next ten years or so, arguments continued back and forth between all three of these options until genetic studies finally settled the matter in 2003. 

The First Cows In Europe?

When we look at scientific lists of animals, we usually see them placed into neat groups based on their relationships: families, subfamilies, and so on. These are, however, entirely human constructions, and nature is rarely so tidy in reality. Even for mammals, which have been more thoroughly studied than, say, fish or invertebrates, disagreements can arise, and details can change.

At least in the case of mammal groups above the species level, the relationships are faily well understood by this point, thanks to the advance in molecular and genetic studies over the last couple of decades. Disputes are more likely to arise when we question how broadly we should define a particular group, and what taxonomic level it might have. (The latter, of course, are entirely artificial; the cat family is provably a 'real' thing, but the fact that we call it a 'family' rather than giving it some other rank is essentially arbitrary).

This becomes a much bigger issue when we look at animals we know only from fossils. For one thing, we will have fewer, and generally less complete, specimens to examine. Furthermore, unless they are really recent, genetic analysis is out of the question. But, on top of all of that, when we travel back in time, lines become inherently blurred. There's always going to be the question of where exactly the 'not yet X' becomes 'X', even if we had perfect information about them. Which we don't.