Goo Goo G'joob

"Pinnipeds" is the technical term for flipper-footed aquatic mammals that are able (although often with difficulty) to move about on land. Although there had previously been some speculation on the point, we now know that they are a natural group of animals, all descending from a single distant ancestor. They are carnivorans, more closely related to dogs than to cats and probably represent the third major branching within the living dog-like carnivores, after the dogs and bears, but before (for example) the raccoons, skunks, and weasels.

The living species of pinniped are placed within three families, although one or two extinct ones are also recognised. Most pinnipeds belong to the Phocidae, or "seal family". While the term "seal" is often used in modern English to refer to pinnipeds in general, the seal family proper consists of animals especially well-adapted to living in the water. They lack visible ears, and their hind limbs are arranged so to be efficient for propulsion underwater, but almost useless on land, forcing them to haul themselves about using their front flippers only.

Euplerids: Madagascar's Top Mammalian Carnivore

The native mammalian carnivores of Madagascar are mostly obscure to those of us in the West. The one possible exception, thanks to the Madagascar animated film franchise, is the fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). Often spelt with a single 's', especially in more modern sources, and typically pronounced "foosa", this is the largest and most potentially dangerous of all the island's native mammalian predators.

Having said which, it's not especially big compared with predators elsewhere. There is little need to be a large carnivore when the island does not have, for example, any native antelopes. On average, they are about 75 cm (30 inches) in body length, not counting a cat-like tail that adds about the same length again. Adult females weigh around 6 kg (13 lbs), while the largest males can reach 8.5 kg (19 lbs), about the same as a West Highland terrier. 

Exactly where they fit within the mammalian family tree was long a source of confusion, given a mix of features resembling a range of other animals. When English zoologist Edward Turner Bennett first described the animal in 1833, he considered it to be a type of unusually large civet. So it remained for a hundred until it was moved to the cats in the 1930s, back to the civets in the 1940s, and then to the mongooses in the 1990s. Over the next ten years or so, arguments continued back and forth between all three of these options until genetic studies finally settled the matter in 2003. 

The First Cows In Europe?

When we look at scientific lists of animals, we usually see them placed into neat groups based on their relationships: families, subfamilies, and so on. These are, however, entirely human constructions, and nature is rarely so tidy in reality. Even for mammals, which have been more thoroughly studied than, say, fish or invertebrates, disagreements can arise, and details can change.

At least in the case of mammal groups above the species level, the relationships are faily well understood by this point, thanks to the advance in molecular and genetic studies over the last couple of decades. Disputes are more likely to arise when we question how broadly we should define a particular group, and what taxonomic level it might have. (The latter, of course, are entirely artificial; the cat family is provably a 'real' thing, but the fact that we call it a 'family' rather than giving it some other rank is essentially arbitrary).

This becomes a much bigger issue when we look at animals we know only from fossils. For one thing, we will have fewer, and generally less complete, specimens to examine. Furthermore, unless they are really recent, genetic analysis is out of the question. But, on top of all of that, when we travel back in time, lines become inherently blurred. There's always going to be the question of where exactly the 'not yet X' becomes 'X', even if we had perfect information about them. Which we don't.

Two Million Years of Llamas

The camel family is one of the smaller mammal families in the present day, containing just seven species, four of which are domesticated. Thus, if you don't consider, say, dogs to be distinct from wolves at the species level, one could reasonably argue that there are only four. Although these are all considered to belong to the same subfamily (with all the other subfamilies being extinct), they still fall into two branches: the 'true' camels in the Old World, and their counterparts in the Americas.

It should come as no surprise that members of the family are noted for their ability to survive in arid environments with minimal water. They are, for example, more efficient at absorbing water from their stomach than ruminants such as cattle and deer, and genetically resistant to heat stress and ultraviolet radiation. Nonetheless, while the word "camel" doubtless conjures up an image of one or more of the three Old World species (that is, the dromedary and the wild and domesticated versions of the Bactrian camel), the family also includes those four American species.

The Genomics of Yellow Bats

In terms of species, bats are the second-largest order of mammals, after the rodents. New species are identified all the time, due in part to the relative difficulty of closely examining night-flying mammals, many of which sleep in hard-to-access caves. The current total stands at over a thousand, representing over 20% of all known mammal species. 

Within this huge group, there is, perhaps, rather more diversity than many people realise. While bats have probably not received the same level of attention as some other mammal groups, scientists have nonetheless long attempted to disentangle the relationships between all these subgroups. (Also, when I say they have received less attention, there's a mammal-centric bias here; it's probably still a lot better than, say lizards, let alone millipedes or the like). 

Euplerids: Falanoucs and Fanalokas

Fanaloka

The relationships of the native Madagascan carnivores were uncertain before the advent of genetic testing at the end of the 20th century. The majority were assumed to be mongooses, since that is very much what they looked like, but three species didn't quite fit the pattern. 

Two of these were, so far as anyone could tell from their physical appearance and habits, civets. They were often placed in their own subfamily, reflecting their distance from other civets, but nonetheless, they were thought to belong among the viverrids. Following genetic studies in 2003, however, it became clear that they belonged in the same group as (i.e. shared a unique common ancestor with) the Madagascan "mongooses". Since some of them clearly weren't mongooses, and since they had diverged from the real ones so long ago, the subfamily was split off and promoted to full family level, now including both the mongoose-like and civet-like species.

Eocene (Pt 4): Ancient Beasts of the European Archipelago

Propalaeotherium

The story of the evolution of the horse is one of the most commonly cited examples of evolutionary trends, often illustrated by a series of increasingly horse-like animals with an ever-reducing number of toes. The animal typically shown at the start of that series is, depending partly on the age of the picture, either Hyracotherium or Eohippus.

Hyracotherium was long regarded as the earliest known member of the horse family. In recent decades, it has become apparent that it wasn't really a horse, in the sense that modern horses don't descend from it or its relatives, and today we call the family it belonged to the palaeotheres. The North American Eohippus, on the other hand, despite long being thought to be identical to Hyracotherium, probably is a horse. The confusion between the two means that it's often difficult to tell which is being referred to in older sources.