The Family Lives of Elephants

In 1961, Irven Buss published a scientific paper in which he proposed that the fundamental social unit among African elephants could best be described as a family group. While this put the subject on a firm scientific footing for the first time, he was hardly the first person to have noticed. Even white Europeans had at least mentioned the idea going back to the 19th century, particularly with regard to the Asian elephants living in the British Raj. 

Not to mention that the locals had surely noticed, and just not written scientific papers about it.

800th Synapsida

Some primates, to make up for a scarcity of posts...

This will be the 800th post to be posted in this blog. That means it is once again time for me to take a break from doing anything original and take a look back at the last couple of years or so. There have been some changes in how I've been doing things since the last of these updates, but they're relatively minor, and posting has generally been pretty regular.

The most common topic in the last 100 posts has been animal behaviour, which has overtaken the usual frontrunner of evolution. It's a broad topic, of course, and the exact ranking will come down to the variability of how I happen to label posts, but it shows that it's not all taxonomy and anatomical adaptations here. In particular, there have been several posts about sociability of late, partly due to the discussions of how different dolphin species associate into pods. There have also, as usual, been several posts on diet and habitat, both topics that inevitably come up a lot when I discuss particular living animals, or even the way that they have changed over millions of years. 

Eocene (Pt 6): Gophers, Camels, and Lady Gaga

Leptomeryx

World climate fluctuated during the Eocene epoch, but it was consistently warmer than it is today, including the lengthy Climatic Optimum, the hottest the world has been since the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs. This naturally affected not just the weather, but where different types of vegetation were found. Much of North America was covered with subtropical forests, with at least some palm trees reaching as far north as Alaska, and temperate woodlands on the northern Canadian islands.

The animals you would have encountered in these woods would also have been unfamiliar, with most of the mammals not fitting within any family we would recognise today. Nonetheless, there were some exceptions.

All the World's Antelopes: Waterbuck and marsh-dwellers

Kob

One of the features of the reduncinine subfamily of antelopes, as opposed to most of the other groupings, is that they require ready access to standing water. Many of them, such as the reedbucks, are grassland animals, avoiding the driest areas, but otherwise living in plains and mountains, only retreating to riverbanks and marshes during the dry season. Others may, if anything, be even more tied to the water.

The kob (Kobus kob) lives across the savannah belt south of the Sahara, from Senegal to Uganda. It is said to never be seen more than 10 km (6 miles) from standing water, and usually much less. The unusually blunt scientific name comes from two different authors, with Charles Hamilton Smith having added the first half in 1840, after the animal had been originally described (as Antilope kob) by Erxleben much earlier, in 1777.

Dishonest Bears

Mammals use a variety of means to communicate with one another: vocal, scent, and visual. Even those that are mostly solitary need to do this from time to time, whether to mark out their territories as a warning to others or to attract mates. 

Often these signals need to convey more than the basic message, but also provide some information about the animal that left them. This often includes physical fitness, whether to intimidate potential intruders or to advertise oneself as a sexual partner. At close range, this can be achieved through such things as growing huge antlers, proving that you have the physical capacity to waste resources on something that's otherwise pointless. But, at longer range, a simple indicator of size may be all that's required.

All the World's Antelopes: Reedbuck and Rhebok

Bohor reedbuck

Quite where, within the larger bovid family, the reedbucks belong was long a matter of contention. They are medium-sized antelopes, tending to prefer habitats with plenty of water, distinguished by the fact that not only their visible horns, but also the bony cores on the inside, have transverse ridges running round them. The detailed structure of their teeth has some resemblance to that of the true bovines (that is, cows, bison, and the like) but it's hard to see that as anything other than parallel evolution. 

The most widely followed scheme in the late 20th century placed them with the grazing antelopes, such as sables and their kin, but even then there was a suspicion that this was only because nobody knew what else to do with them. Once we were able to do detailed genetic analysis, it turned out that they are pretty much in a group of their own, not especially close to anything, having diverged from the ancestors of the true grazing antelopes before that group diverged from the goats. Our best guess is that this happened between 16 and 14 million years ago; there are antelopes with longer lineages, but not many.

Hippos in the Tiber

The hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) is an iconic African animal. While their distribution is very patchy, in part due to their reliance on large waterways, they are found across essentially the whole of Africa south of the Sahara and north of the Kalahari and the South African veldt. A second, endangered, species belonging to the same family, the pygmy hippo (Choeropsis liberiensis), lives only on the southern coast of West Africa, between Sierra Leone and Côte d'Ivoire. 

But hippos were once common in Europe and southern Asia. In the case of Europe, for example, we have fossils from Portugal to Greece, and as far north as the UK. Nevertheless, hippos have never been especially diverse, at least in comparison to groups such as deer or pigs, and they are grouped into no more than around six widely accepted genera. This includes the two that are still with us, and we don't have a large amount of information on three of the others.

All the World's Antelopes: Sables and Other Horse-Antelopes

Sable antelope (male)

The hippotragines are one of several small subfamilies of antelope. Small that is, in terms of number of species, because physically they are quite large. The name literally translates as "horse-goat", but that second part is often used taxonomically as a term for antelopes, so "horse-antelope" might be closer to the intent. It was coined in 1845, partly on account of the physical build of the animals, with their long legs and muscular, horse-like necks.

The subfamily includes the oryxes and gemsbok, but arguably the most horse-like members of the group are the sable antelope (Hippotragus niger) and its closest relatives. Sable antelopes stand around 140 cm (4'7") at the withers, which is almost exactly the official height that separates full-size horses from ponies. They weigh between 160 kg and 230 kg (350 and 510 lbs), which is well within the range for domesticated ponies, indicating a slighter build than animals bred, in part, to bear the weight of humans. Their shape, however, is quite horse-like, an effect accentuated by the presence of a clear mane down the back of the neck.

Otter Whiskers

Four years ago, I posted about whiskers, a feature common to the majority of mammal species, from horses to mice. They are so widespread that they must have evolved very early on, probably well before marsupials diverged from the placental mammals, back in the time of the non-avian dinosaurs. Even so, as humans, we are probably most familiar with them from domesticated animals, especially the carnivorous ones that so often share our homes.

The carnivorans form a natural evolutionary group within the placental mammals, arbitrarily (if conveniently) ranked as an "order". The various living families within this order can in turn be classified as either "feliform" or "caniform", depending on whether they are more closely related to cats or dogs. The dog-like group contains a great many species, which might be more varied than we would think at first glance.

Eocene (Pt 5): Cerberus and the Pangolins

Eurotamandua

Today, when we think of large carnivorous land mammals, we think of such things as dogs, cats, and bears, but, while some of these families do date back to the Eocene, they were not found in Europe at the time. Instead, the dominant group of carnivorous mammals were the hyaenodonts.

While the name translates as "hyena-tooth" due to the description of the first fossils to be found, hyaenodonts were not hyenas, or even closely related to them. They belonged to a group entirely separate from the living carnivorans, and that survived alongside them until as recently as 10 million years ago, near the end of the Miocene. For most of that time, they could be regarded as primitive holdovers, vestiges of their past glory, but in the Eocene they were still at the height of their power.

Having said this, the first hynaenodonts to enter Europe were physically unimpressive, succeeding largely due to the fact that there wasn't much else to compete with. These are traditionally grouped into a subfamily called the "proviverrines", although the details are debated. For one thing, it's not at all clear which family (if any) they are a subfamily of. This is largely due to the higher-level classification having shifted since they were first named, but the membership of the group is also in doubt, since it's not at all clear that all of the traditionally defined species share a unique common ancestor with one another.

All the World's Antelopes: Gemsbok and Oryx

Gemsbok

As I have discussed previously, there is no such thing as an antelope, in the strict scientific sense. That is to say, they do not form a natural group of organisms, being defined only as those members of the cattle family that aren't sheep, goats, or obviously cow-like. This covers a wide range of animals, some closely related, but others much less so.

I've previously looked at the various species of gazelle, and at the spiral-horned antelopes (which are actually "bovines"). Now it's time to look at the others.

Linnaeus' original catalogue of scientific names, published in 1758, included five species that we would now call antelopes. In that catalogue, they are listed as goats, based primarily on the shape of their horns, and therefore sit alongside the chamois and ibex. Two of these, the dorcas gazelle and the blackbuck, are now placed within the gazelle subfamily, while two others are relatively small "dwarf antelopes", which I will cover later.

Goo Goo G'joob

"Pinnipeds" is the technical term for flipper-footed aquatic mammals that are able (although often with difficulty) to move about on land. Although there had previously been some speculation on the point, we now know that they are a natural group of animals, all descending from a single distant ancestor. They are carnivorans, more closely related to dogs than to cats and probably represent the third major branching within the living dog-like carnivores, after the dogs and bears, but before (for example) the raccoons, skunks, and weasels.

The living species of pinniped are placed within three families, although one or two extinct ones are also recognised. Most pinnipeds belong to the Phocidae, or "seal family". While the term "seal" is often used in modern English to refer to pinnipeds in general, the seal family proper consists of animals especially well-adapted to living in the water. They lack visible ears, and their hind limbs are arranged so to be efficient for propulsion underwater, but almost useless on land, forcing them to haul themselves about using their front flippers only.

Euplerids: Madagascar's Top Mammalian Carnivore

The native mammalian carnivores of Madagascar are mostly obscure to those of us in the West. The one possible exception, thanks to the Madagascar animated film franchise, is the fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). Often spelt with a single 's', especially in more modern sources, and typically pronounced "foosa", this is the largest and most potentially dangerous of all the island's native mammalian predators.

Having said which, it's not especially big compared with predators elsewhere. There is little need to be a large carnivore when the island does not have, for example, any native antelopes. On average, they are about 75 cm (30 inches) in body length, not counting a cat-like tail that adds about the same length again. Adult females weigh around 6 kg (13 lbs), while the largest males can reach 8.5 kg (19 lbs), about the same as a West Highland terrier. 

Exactly where they fit within the mammalian family tree was long a source of confusion, given a mix of features resembling a range of other animals. When English zoologist Edward Turner Bennett first described the animal in 1833, he considered it to be a type of unusually large civet. So it remained for a hundred until it was moved to the cats in the 1930s, back to the civets in the 1940s, and then to the mongooses in the 1990s. Over the next ten years or so, arguments continued back and forth between all three of these options until genetic studies finally settled the matter in 2003. 

The First Cows In Europe?

When we look at scientific lists of animals, we usually see them placed into neat groups based on their relationships: families, subfamilies, and so on. These are, however, entirely human constructions, and nature is rarely so tidy in reality. Even for mammals, which have been more thoroughly studied than, say, fish or invertebrates, disagreements can arise, and details can change.

At least in the case of mammal groups above the species level, the relationships are faily well understood by this point, thanks to the advance in molecular and genetic studies over the last couple of decades. Disputes are more likely to arise when we question how broadly we should define a particular group, and what taxonomic level it might have. (The latter, of course, are entirely artificial; the cat family is provably a 'real' thing, but the fact that we call it a 'family' rather than giving it some other rank is essentially arbitrary).

This becomes a much bigger issue when we look at animals we know only from fossils. For one thing, we will have fewer, and generally less complete, specimens to examine. Furthermore, unless they are really recent, genetic analysis is out of the question. But, on top of all of that, when we travel back in time, lines become inherently blurred. There's always going to be the question of where exactly the 'not yet X' becomes 'X', even if we had perfect information about them. Which we don't.

Two Million Years of Llamas

The camel family is one of the smaller mammal families in the present day, containing just seven species, four of which are domesticated. Thus, if you don't consider, say, dogs to be distinct from wolves at the species level, one could reasonably argue that there are only four. Although these are all considered to belong to the same subfamily (with all the other subfamilies being extinct), they still fall into two branches: the 'true' camels in the Old World, and their counterparts in the Americas.

It should come as no surprise that members of the family are noted for their ability to survive in arid environments with minimal water. They are, for example, more efficient at absorbing water from their stomach than ruminants such as cattle and deer, and genetically resistant to heat stress and ultraviolet radiation. Nonetheless, while the word "camel" doubtless conjures up an image of one or more of the three Old World species (that is, the dromedary and the wild and domesticated versions of the Bactrian camel), the family also includes those four American species.

The Genomics of Yellow Bats

In terms of species, bats are the second-largest order of mammals, after the rodents. New species are identified all the time, due in part to the relative difficulty of closely examining night-flying mammals, many of which sleep in hard-to-access caves. The current total stands at over a thousand, representing over 20% of all known mammal species. 

Within this huge group, there is, perhaps, rather more diversity than many people realise. While bats have probably not received the same level of attention as some other mammal groups, scientists have nonetheless long attempted to disentangle the relationships between all these subgroups. (Also, when I say they have received less attention, there's a mammal-centric bias here; it's probably still a lot better than, say lizards, let alone millipedes or the like). 

Euplerids: Falanoucs and Fanalokas

Fanaloka

The relationships of the native Madagascan carnivores were uncertain before the advent of genetic testing at the end of the 20th century. The majority were assumed to be mongooses, since that is very much what they looked like, but three species didn't quite fit the pattern. 

Two of these were, so far as anyone could tell from their physical appearance and habits, civets. They were often placed in their own subfamily, reflecting their distance from other civets, but nonetheless, they were thought to belong among the viverrids. Following genetic studies in 2003, however, it became clear that they belonged in the same group as (i.e. shared a unique common ancestor with) the Madagascan "mongooses". Since some of them clearly weren't mongooses, and since they had diverged from the real ones so long ago, the subfamily was split off and promoted to full family level, now including both the mongoose-like and civet-like species.

Eocene (Pt 4): Ancient Beasts of the European Archipelago

Propalaeotherium

The story of the evolution of the horse is one of the most commonly cited examples of evolutionary trends, often illustrated by a series of increasingly horse-like animals with an ever-reducing number of toes. The animal typically shown at the start of that series is, depending partly on the age of the picture, either Hyracotherium or Eohippus.

Hyracotherium was long regarded as the earliest known member of the horse family. In recent decades, it has become apparent that it wasn't really a horse, in the sense that modern horses don't descend from it or its relatives, and today we call the family it belonged to the palaeotheres. The North American Eohippus, on the other hand, despite long being thought to be identical to Hyracotherium, probably is a horse. The confusion between the two means that it's often difficult to tell which is being referred to in older sources. 

Looking for Leaves: the Travel Routines of a Koala

Animals inevitably have a preference for the particular habitat in which they live. Factors such as climate and the presence of suitable hiding and sleeping places are important, along with the presence of suitable food. While climate is less of a problem, food and shelter may be patchily distributed, with insufficient food in any one place to support the animal for long. The animal may also wish to avoid sheltering in any one place for too long, less predators find it easy to locate, and it also makes sense to travel between different patches of land if you want to find mates.

Thus, it can be important to know not merely which habitats a particular species of animal prefers, but how it moves about within that habitat to use to its best advantage. Does it tend to revisit particular patches of ground, and if so, how often? A herbivore, after all, wouldn't want to head back to a given place before whatever it had eaten there had had a chance to regrow.

Euplerids: The Not-Mongooses of Madagascar

Ring-tailed vontsira

There are around 35 currently recognised species of mongoose, spread between Asia and continental Africa. For the most part, they look fairly similar, with most being instantly identifiable as such. For most of the 20th century, however, they were also thought to live on Madagascar. In the last couple of decades, genetic studies have revealed that the Madgascan species, while related to the mongoose family proper, belong in a group of their own. That's partly because they diverged so far back in time, but also because that group includes some animals that manifestly aren't mongooses.

Today, in order to distinguish what we used to call "Madagascan mongooses" from the real sort, we tend to use the local Malagasy word and describe them as "vontsiras".

Not Leaving Home: Wolves on the Serengeti

There is a popular belief that wolf packs are led by an "alpha male", a dominant individual who directs the pack and monopolises breeding opportunities through the force of his masculine aggression. It's all-but universal in modern stories about werewolves, and has even crept into the messaging of online influencers, apparently following the reasoning that anything true of wolves must necessarily also be true of humans.

It is, however, simply not true.

Having said which, it used to be a serious scientific theory, derived from behavioural studies on captive wolves conducted in the mid 20th century. Better studies at the end of the century, looking at wolves in their natural habitats and not stressed by close confinement with non-family members in zoo cages, revealed the truth: not only is the dominant female at least as important as the male, but the correct word for that dominant pair isn't "alpha", it's "parents".

A Brief History of Zokors

The rodents are the largest group of mammals, in terms of number of species, and they are divided into several families. Some of these are familiar, such as the mice, voles, squirrels, and gophers, but others are much less so, at least to the majority of people in the West. This includes, for example, the zokors.

There are a couple of reasons why zokors are not as well-known as some other rodent groups. For one thing, they only live in northeast Asia, an area that it's fair to say doesn't receive much attention in the Western world. For another, even if you did live there, you wouldn't see them very often, because they are burrowing animals that don't like coming to the surface if they can help it. Rather like moles, you might see the mounds of earth they leave, but not often the animal itself.

Strange Carnivores of Madagascar

Madagascar is the fourth-largest island in the world, almost three times the size of Great Britain, or half again the size of California. We should not be surprised, therefore, that it has a considerable amount of native wildlife. However, it's also noteworthy that it has been an island for a very long time - certainly for far longer than Britain has been.

In fact, Madagascar became an island around 91 million years ago, over 20 million years before even the likes of Tyrannosaurus appeared on the scene. Moreover, this was when it split away from what was then the island of India, with its break from Africa being almost twice as far back in time. But, even if we take that younger date for the beginning of its isolation from any sort of 'mainland', it's well before any of the sort of mammals we would recognise today had evolved. There's no equivalent here of mammoths nipping across the English Channel.

Covid and the Landscape of Fear

Left to their own devices, animals will wander about wherever there is food or other useful resources to be found. They would be limited only by the physical properties of their landscape, such as the inability to cross a wide river or the presence of a barren mountain range. Reality, of course, is never quite this simple.

The earliest use of the term "landscape of fear" that I could find on a quick search referred to a study about how female college students felt while walking particular routes alone after dark. Put in this context, one can well understand why people don't necessarily pick the simplest or most direct route to their objective, and why there are certain places one might simply wish to avoid altogether.

Viverrids: The Odd Ones Out

Binturong

Most viverrids have a similar appearance: slender, long-snouted animals, many of them spotted or brown-coated. One, however, stands out as particularly distinctive. This is the binturong (Arctitis binturong) and it's the largest species of "civet", with a total body length ranging from 61 to 96 cm (24 to 38 inches) and weighing between 9 and 20 kg (20 to 44 lbs), similar to small dog such as a Jack Russell or border terrier. Moreover, they appear somewhat larger than they are because, unlike other civets, they have a thick shaggy coat that obscures their actual body.

They are mostly black in colour but with grizzled fur that makes them look grey, and prominent white whiskers. The tail is long and prehensile, and the feet have large, rough pads, giving them an enhanced grip. In other respects, however, they are civet-like, with the same general pattern of teeth and other detailed anatomical features, including a simple perineal scent gland.

Eocene (Pt 3): Sword Teeth and River Pigs

Anoplotherium

Today, by number of species, the most successful group of large mammalian herbivores are the terrestrial artiodactyls - broadly speaking, the "cloven-footed mammals". Except for Australia, they are a key element of almost any mammalian fauna. Their first great burst of diversity occurred during the Middle Eocene, over 40 million years ago, when many new forms appeared across the Northern Hemisphere, some unique to particular places, others more widespread.

Most, however, were nothing we would recognise today. There were as yet no cattle, antelopes, deer, or pigs, and many of the creatures that did live that far back left, so far as we can tell, no living descendants.

Hedgehogs versus Killer Robots

Hearing is a key sense for just about any mammal species. While humans, and primates in general, place particular importance on vision, this isn't true for many other mammals. Granted, that's usually because of the significance of scent, which we humans are particularly bad at, but hearing can hardly be discounted, even for us. 

The range of hearing, however, varies dramatically between different species. For humans, the typical range is from about 20 to 20,000 Hertz, which covers about 10 octaves (middle C is 261 Hz) although the upper range drops off with age, and there is some leeway under perfect conditions. Many mammals can hear outside this range, with smaller animals, in particular, being able to hear higher notes. This can be of more than academic interest, since it means that the soundscape a particular animal lives in may not be the same as our own, and that can have a bearing on conservation - we might think somewhere is quiet and peaceful, but other species might not agree.

The Thrush-beaked Consort Bird

A modern thrush

This post will be the latest as of 1st April, so it's that time again...

About 40% of all living mammal species are rodents. Over a third of those that aren't are bats, leaving just 38% belonging to any other group - primates, cloven-hoofed mammals and all the rest. These are, at least in terms of speciation, clearly very successful body plans.

But the bias is even stronger with birds. A whopping 60% of living bird species belong to just one order: the Passeriformes. The chances are that, if you think of a "typical bird" the image that pops into your head is of a passerine. There are about 140 different families of passerine (the exact number being a matter of taste among ornithologists), of which 123 constitute the songbirds.

Viverrids: Long-tailed Palm Civets (and coffee...)

Common palm civet

While the palm civets do, arguably, form a single group of related animals, they are spread between two subfamilies that diverged at least 23 million years ago, at the dawn of the Miocene epoch. This is only about 5 million years after the split between the true civets and the genets, so it's fair to say that the two subfamilies are distinct. The subfamily that includes the animal originally known in the West as a "palm civet" is that of the paradoxurines.

The animal in question is now known simply as the common palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus). The alternative name of "Asian palm civet" is also often seen, although it has the disadvantage of not clearly distinguishing it from all the other palm civets that live in Asia. Which, since there are no palm civets outside of Asia, isn't really narrowing it down much.

The Patagonian Homunculus

In 1891, Argentinian naturalist Florentino Ameghino, the founding father of South American palaeontology, described a new species of fossil primate. Naming it Homunculus ("little man"), he recognised that it resembled a lemur almost as much as a monkey and must therefore be very primitive, but he was unable to categorise it further.

To be fair, all he had at the time was a section of the lower jaw. Over the next seven years, working with his brother Carlos, he uncovered a few further specimens. These included part of a skull and some limb bones, but the exact details of what they had discovered remained obscure, beyond the fact that it was a primate of some sort.

It didn't help that, after 1898, the next discovery of a fossil belonging to the genus didn't happen until the 1980s. And that was only a few isolated teeth. Since then, nothing until the current century.

Black Bears and the Uncertain Apex

The concept of the food pyramid is a central one in ecology. The idea is that since consumption cannot ever be 100% efficient, every type of animal must necessarily be less common than whatever it is that it feed on, at least in terms of its total biomass. Plants are more common than herbivores are more common than small carnivores are more common than larger carnivores.

The actual picture is more complicated than this. Many "carnivores" are at least partly omnivorous, and they often eat large herbivores more regularly than they eat small carnivores. Plus, we also need to consider the detritivores and parasites. But the general pattern holds, and at the top of the pyramid, we find the apex predators. 

It's possible to argue as to what exactly constitutes an apex predator. The general idea, however, is that they feed on other animals without being preyed upon themselves. At least among terrestrial mammals, an average body mass of more than about 15 kg (33 lbs) is generally about enough that predators need to manage their own population (through competition, territoriality, infanticide, etc.) rather than having to worry about something larger and scarier managing it for them. 

Viverrids: Half-Weasel Palm Civets

Banded palm civet

The word "civet", as currently used in English, is a rather broad term, referring to a wide range of vaguely similar-looking animals. Not all of these are even members of the "civet family" as we currently understand it, and even those that are don't form a natural biological group within that family. 

The word was originally Arabic (pronounced something like "zabad") and would have referred to the animals that medieval Arabs were familiar with, which, given how far they traded, would have included both African and South Asian species. These are still regarded as "true civets" today, but the word now also appears in the name of the "palm civets", long thought to be merely a variant of the true sort.

Beavers in the Wetlands

The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) is one of two living species of beaver, along with its Eurasian counterpart. They are, of course, rodents - they are related to gophers - and relatively large ones at that. They are found across all but the most treeless parts of the US and Canada, as well as the border regions of northern Mexico; they have even been introduced to Finland, Belgium, and Argentina. They are a relatively common species across much of this range, something that has been helped in recent decades by restrictions on hunting.

Nonetheless, while not endangered themselves, they can be key to maintaining ecosystems, not least because they are one of the few nonhuman species that substantially modifies the land around them. Their ability to alter wetland habitats by dam-building has been identified as a key factor in maintaining other species at greater risk, such as amphibians in the Rocky Mountains. On top of which, their habit of cutting down trees affects the composition of the forests in which they live.

Eocene (Pt 2): In the Jungles of Europe

Heterohyus

During the Eocene epoch, Europe was very different from the way it is today. For one thing, it was still separated from Asia, with the Turgai Strait running between the two, roughly from what would now be the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean. But, were you to look at a map without any modern day context, you probably wouldn't call it a continent, because it wasn't a single landmass, but a chain of large islands.

The biggest of these lay to the north, encompassing Scandinavia and the lands to the east. Just south of that, the second-largest was the one that would later become Britain, France, Germany, and some of their smaller neighbours. A smaller, but still sizable, Iberian island lay to the southwest, and a collection of low-lying ones occupied the south and east, with the more mountainous parts of that region having yet to form.

But, even if you didn't know the changes in the geography, if you could simply travel back in time to the Early Eocene and look around you, it wouldn't feel much like Europe. The continent was closer to the equator than it was now - northern Germany was about where Milan is today - but, even ignoring that, the world as a whole was much hotter. This is part of the reason for the islands, since there were no ice caps back then, but it means that our hypothetical time traveller would be, in almost any part of the landmass, standing in a jungle.

Viverrids: Genets of Central and Southern Africa

Rusty-spotted genet

The genets are one of the most speciose of the carnivoran genera, with at least fourteen species living across Africa and, in the case of the common genet, just beyond it. However, the majority of the species have been little studied. As small, nocturnal carnivores often dwelling in hard-to-reach places, it is relatively hard to do so, and they lack the cachet that applies to larger, more glamorous animals such as cheetahs, hyenas, or even wild cats. 

It probably doesn't help that there is not a great visual or (so far as we know) behavioural difference between them. In many cases, the easiest way to tell them apart is simply to note where they were found. There are subtle differences between them, to be sure, but you may have to look quite closely, and the variations are often matters of degree. Nonetheless, let's see what I can say as I take a look at the seven confirmed species that I didn't cover in the last one.

Rabbits in the Ice Ages

The rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is one of the more familiar mammal species to most people in the developed world, not least because it has been partially domesticated. Moreover, wild and feral rabbits are found across wide parts of the world, living on every continent except Antarctica. They are adaptable animals, able to survive in a wide range of different habitats, from hot semidesert to forests and bleak moorland. So much so, in fact, that, in most parts of the world, they are a pest.

The rabbit is widespread because we humans have spread it, following the initial domestication event in France, no later than 800 AD. This was originally for meat and fur, with pet breeds appearing only from the late 18th century. Rabbits are now found, for example, on Middleton Island, a chilly speck of land 130 km (80 miles) off the south coast of Alaska, and on the Kerguelen archipelago in the Indian Ocean, which is about as remote a place as it's possible to get.

Running Hyenas of Greece

Chasmaporthetes

Mentioning a "hyena" today likely brings to mind the image of a muscular, aggressive, scavenging creature, probably with a spotted coat. This, the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), is, however, only one of three species alive today, with the two lesser-known ones being smaller and less aggressive. In fact, the hyena family includes a fourth living species as well, although this isn't always referred to as a "hyena" because it's really only dangerous to termites and can't crack bone like "true" hyenas can.

Four living species isn't very many for a family of mammals but, like many other such small groups, there is a long fossil history that includes a great many extinct forms. These varied in form even more than the living species do. At one extreme are animals larger and stronger even than the living spotted hyena, while at the other (all living very early on) are small tree-climbing animals that looked more like civets. 

Somewhere in between are the "running hyenas".

Viverrids: Genets of Northern Africa (and beyond)

Common genet

At the dawn of scientific taxonomy in 1758, the group of animals that would later become the civet family included four species that we still recognise today. Two of these - skunks and mongooses - were later moved elsewhere, and one of the others was, of course, the defining species of the family, the large Indian civet.

The other was the common genet (Genetta genetta). Frédéric Cuvier split the genets off from the civets proper in 1816, recognising just one other species - which molecular evidence has since shown isn't a viverrid at all, although this wasn't obvious even in the late 20th century. His basis for the distinction was that genets have a much smaller scent gland than civets, although he conceded that the secretions it produced were, in his words, "très manifeste". 

Just Cold Enough

Northern meadow jumping mouse

Hibernation is one of the most effective means that mammals can employ to withstand harsh winter temperatures. Many mammals, especially larger ones, use other means, such as growing a winter coat, caching food, or simply moving somewhere warmer, but, if the goal is to reduce energy requirements when you can't get out to feed, hibernation is the most effective means of doing so.

During hibernation, bodily metabolism slows right down, so that an animal may need as little as 1% of its usual calorie supply to stay healthy. This has negative consequences, so that the animal does need to wake at intervals to stave them off, and how often this happens varies from species to species. In this respect, true hibernation can be distinguished from shorter, often daily, bouts of torpor by the fact that each "sleep" can last for weeks or even months. 

Staying Away from the Boys

Many large, hooved mammals live in herds. This has obvious advantages of safety in numbers, spreading the work of looking out for predators, as well as benefiting from the knowledge of more experienced herd members as to the best places to find food or shelter. The structure and composition of these herds vary from species to species, but one common trait is that males and females often form single sex herds that travel apart for much of the year.

This is referred to as "sexual segregation", and was first formally described by Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man. It isn't unique to mammalian herd animals, being seen in everything from fish shoals to bird flocks, as well as in non-hooved mammals (dolphins, bats, primates, etc.) Most zoological research, however, has tended to focus on large cloven-hooved mammals, such as deer and antelopes.